About us
CONTACT US
CAREERS
MY FOLDER
ENGLISH
FRENCH
عربي
GERMAN
SPANISH
SEARCH
Subscribe
Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization Consulting
Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization Consulting
Energy Transition Strategy Design and Implementation
Energy Efficiency (Retrofit) Project Development Consulting, Funding and Execution Management
Solar and Cleantech Project Development Consulting, Funding and Execution Management
Measurement and Verification (M&V) Audit of Energy Savings and Digitalization of M&V
Specialized Technical Consulting
Specialized Technical Consulting
Building Recommissioning
Designing for High Performing Building
Low Delta-T Rehabilitation Assessment and Execution Management
Thermal Cooling Load Assessment
BTU-Submetering Feasibility & Rollout Support
Digitalization of Energy and Carbon Management
Digitalization of Energy and Carbon Management
Digital Energy Management Information System (arkEMIS)
Utility Management (arkUM)
CarbonHub
iSave
Insights
Insights
Decarbonization to Net Zero Strategy Cases
Energy Efficiency (Retrofit) Project Development Cases
Solar and Cleantech Project Development Cases
Measurement and Verification Cases
Specialized Technical Services Cases
Digitalization of Energy Management and Carbon Accounting Cases
Resources
Resources
Client Results and Success Stories
Use cases
Webinars
News and Media
Blogs
Affiliations
Newsletter
Featured
Solar & Cleantech / Industrial
READ MORE
Book Consultation
Book Demo
Subscribe
English
FRENCH
عربي
GERMAN
SPANISH
Energy Efficiency and Decarbonization Consulting
Energy Transition Strategy Design and Implementation
Energy Efficiency (Retrofit) Project Development Consulting, Funding and Execution Management
Solar and Cleantech Project Development Consulting, Funding and Execution Management
Measurement and Verification (M&V) Audit of Energy Savings and Digitalization of M&V
Specialized Technical Consulting
Building Recommissioning
Designing for High Performing Building
Low Delta-T Rehabilitation Assessment and Execution Management
Thermal Cooling Load Assessment
BTU-Submetering Feasibility & Rollout Support
Digitalization of Energy and Carbon Management
Digital Energy Management Information System (arkEMIS)
Utility Management (arkUM)
CarbonHub
iSave
Insights
Decarbonization to Net Zero Strategy Cases
Energy Efficiency (Retrofit) Project Development Cases
Solar and Cleantech Project Development Cases
Measurement and Verification Cases
Specialized Technical Services Cases
Digitalization of Energy Management and Carbon Accounting Cases
Resources
Client Results and Success Stories
Use cases
Webinars
News and Media
Blogs
Affiliations
Newsletter
Careers
Contact us
MY FOLDER
About us
Book Consultation
Book Demo
Solar & Cleantech / Industrial
Energy Export Procedure for a Dairy Farm
Understand how Net Metering & Wheeling can beneficial
Back to Client Impact
Share
Add to folder
Background Story
One of the leading agricultural and dairy holding companies in the UAE has embarked on its energy transition journey by exploring the implementation of a Solar Power Plant. In 2020, the client’s facility had a total energy consumption of 6.7 MWh, distributed between two main lines linked to ranches and livestock.
In Abu Dhabi, two distinct tariff rates apply to agricultural and commercial users. For the client, the ranches are charged at 4.5 Fils/kWh—a significantly lower rate compared to the livestock operations, which are charged 20 Fils/kWh. However, due to regulatory restrictions, the client is unable to benefit from existing wheeling and net-metering mechanisms. Our analysis indicates that the client has a sufficient rooftop area of 15,000 m², allowing for the installation of a Solar PV system with a capacity of up to 2 MWp.
Problems
A key challenge addressed during the project was the impact of low tariff rates for agricultural users, as set by the Al Ain Distribution Company (AADC). Given Abu Dhabi’s regulatory framework at the time, the client was unable to leverage net-metering or wheeling strategies to make use of excess energy. As a result, surplus energy generated by the system had to be curtailed.
Objective
The client’s primary objective is to implement a Solar PV system to offset energy consumption while securing a financing solution that maximizes cost savings. Since net-metering and wheeling were not viable options, Ark Energy conducted an in-depth analysis to determine the optimal Solar PV system size.
Approach
As the client’s consultant, Ark Energy applied a structured twelve-step approach to ensure the most favorable tariff rate and implement a Solar PV system designed to outlast the Solar Leasing Contract. Initially, we identified the ideal plant size through scenario analysis, optimizing solar capacity to minimize energy curtailment and enhance cost efficiency.
Table 1 Comparing plant size scenarios vs cumulative savings & cost efficiency (with optimized scenario highlighted)
System Size
(
MWp
)
Cumulative Savings
(
mAED
)
Cost Efficiency
0.8
4.21
7.512
1
5.28
7.483
1.2
6.31
7.508
1.25
6.56
7.510
1.3
6.83
7.502
1.4
7.28
7.495
1.6
8.30
7.431
1.8
9.19
7.306
2
9.98
6.956
Source:
Ark Energy Analysis
From the analysis conducted, the followed ideal assumption that the possible implemented capacity was 2MWp.Through the scenario analysis, it was determined that the optimized capacity to reduce curtailment and optimize cost efficiency was
1.25 MWp
. This is emphasized in the following chart
Figure 1 Optimized Solar PV System Capacity
Source:
Ark Energy Analysis
At a second level, was to determine the financial feasibility of the project, if the client were to proceed with self-investing or being financed by a 3rd Party . After analyzing different financing options, aside from the Self-Invest, the option of a 3rd Party Purchase Power Agreement (PPA), using a tracking PPA rate is considered as the most ideal in the comparison.
Table 02:
financing options with specified CapEX, Annual Savings & PPA Payout
Source:
Ark Energy Analysis
From the financial analysis conducted, it was clear that the Self Invest model presented the highest annual and life-time savings among all but required an initial investment by the client. Among the 15- and 20-years contracts, the 15-years shows higher life-time savings while the 20-years shows higher annual savings
Figure 02 Plant capacity before and after optimization
Source:
Ark Energy Analysis
Through the implementation of the activities done by Ark Energy, there is an apparent results from the optimized energy production and reduced curtailment of energy
Ark Energy was able to secure the 3rd party investor to fund the development of solar PV system, under a solar leasing (PPA) agreement, in which the client will be paying for the solar power utilized for the term of the 20-year contract. 2,000 MWh per year was produced and paid at a rate of 170 AED/MWh instead of 200.
Related Stories
Solar & Cleantech
Solar Proposal for a Water Bottler Manufacturing Company
Have a look at our proposal structure, which guarantees annual savings of 720,000 USD annually and a 30% reduction energy consumption
READ MORE
Solar & Cleantech
Energy Export Procedure for a Leading Commercial Real Estate Company
Discover our energy export procedure designed to maximize efficiency and cost savings for a leading commercial real estate company, ensuring optimized energy use and increased revenue
READ MORE
Loading...
Ready to Talk?
Connect with one of our experts and tell us how we can help you
 
 
Invalid Email
From time to time, we would like to contact you about our latest updates, as well as other content that may be of interest to you. If you consent to us contacting you for this purpose, please tick below to say how you would like us to contact you:
I agree to receive all newsletters coming from Ark Energy to my Inbox.
Submit